|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Welcome to HIGHER EDUCATION REVIEW
HIGHER EDUCATION REVIEW is an academic journal concerned with policy and practice, with contributions soundly based in research or scholarship, but with implications for reform or change. It seeks to ensure rigour in these analyses by taking a problem oriented approach; it is concerned to help formulate the problems of higher education, to consider alternative solutions and to test them. Lastly, it seeks to cover the whole field of post-school education and with all those who work with or within the field: academics, students, administrators and policymakers at all levels.
Current issue: Summer 2010This edition of Higher Education Review fulfils the intentions set out above by containing articles addressing several key issues in higher education policy: Professor Gillian Evans considers the threats to institutional autonomy posed by current policy; Professor Rob Cuthbert discusses the perilous implications of the identification of students as nature of students as customers; and Peter Williams considers the nature of and mechanisms for maintaining quality and standards. In his 'Notes from North America' Paul Alper revisits James Watson’s ‘The Double Helix’ and manages in his inimitable way to link this to a critical look at features of higher education and culture in the USA. Professor John Pratt Editor
Contents Volume 42 Number 3 Summer 2010 Current policy on university governance may create ‘a profoundly dangerous instability for universities'
‘pushed energetically towards the implementation of a model in which a small body with a majority of external members takes ultimate responsibility for the policy decisions taken in each institution’. Recent conspicuous failures at London Metropolitan and Sussex Universities show functional breakdown, first at the junction between the institution and the state, and second within the institution, where the unity in policy-making between academic and financial-and-managerial decision-making, ‘often proves to be illusory’.
'The idea that students migh be treated as customers triggers academics' antipathy, which in turn can lead to managerial irritation and political frustration. There are different discourses which barely overlap as their protagonists speak past one another'. The article argues that these differences can be reconciled by re-conceiving the relationship between the university and the student.
'The adoption of such a regime would, I believe, both simplify and improve our higher education system, offering a more purposeful and understandable activity for all involved with it, and making its qualifications credible once more'
Plus... Notes from North America:
Books:
Coming shortly:Highlights of the next issue (Autumn 2010) to be published in October
| |||||||||